Actual foreign goods cheaper rates

There are still many problems to be solved to trade defense (PVTM) is used effectively in Vietnam in order to protect the legitimate rights and interests of enterprises (companies) in the context of international economic integration deeper economic.

Talking to the City Legal, Dr. Nguyen Thi Thu Trang, Director of the Centre WTO and Integration Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Vietnam (VCCI), has stressed as above. Ms Page said: "The process of international economic integration of Vietnam are increasingly deepened. No fewer imported goods were sold at record low prices, even for the price "destruction" in Vietnam. These phenomena have been causing heavy losses for businesses in Vietnam and long may affect the prospects of the manufacturing sector in the economy "

 

Opponents blow 19 times, Vietnam blow once

 

. Reporter: Ma'am, so that companies have used measures PVTM how to save themselves?

+ Dr. Nguyen Thi Thu Trang: Countries around the world have long been known to stuff PVTM as antidumping, anti-subsidy, safeguard. They effectively use these tools to protect their businesses from acts of unfair competition from imported goods.

In recent years, Vietnam exports were foreign enterprises initiated 70 anti-dumping cases, seven cases subsidized events and some cases apply other safeguards. Total number of cases leads to apply measures PVTM is 46 cases. Meanwhile, Vietnamese enterprises only use PVTM measures a mere four times, including three cases of safeguard and anti-dumping lawsuit gia.Tong a number of cases leads to apply measures PVTM the two cases.

Thus it is possible for von saying rival blow 19 times while Vietnam only once blow. As a successful attack, they knock us 23 times, we knock them once.

. It is argued that it is not always qualified enterprises to use PVTM measures. What do you think about this?

+ In all four cases PVTM of Vietnam, of the plaintiff always has at least one enterprise with monopoly position or market dominance. This fact is perhaps not too difficult to explain because often these companies have a large market share (dominant) are strong businesses, have sufficient capacity to pursue these complex procedures and have sufficient resources to "invest "in the lawsuit.

Unfortunately, this also means that the tool is still PVTM the tool of "rich" is not a tool to protect the rights and interests of small businesses, which are the subjects suffer The most powerful of these acts of unfair competition of foreign goods in Vietnam.

There are "self-defense weapon," but did not know to use

. She can talk in more detail why PVTM tool has not been used extensively in Vietnam, especially small businesses?

+ First, DN PVTM not known tools. When participating in business, competition with foreign goods, companies are presumed most people understand the competitive situation in the market and thus also about the acts of unfair competition. But there is a fact that most businesses are confused, do not know the behavior management before it as to how to protect their legitimate interests.

Second, some companies, the association learned about the legal stuff but do not understand the conditions, legal requirements and procedures they should follow to be able to use this tool one way effective. In other words, companies and associations, we have "self-defense weapon" in the hands, but either do not know what you're owning them, or that there are no instructions on how to use and how to properly effective.

Third, the companies have said there is "defensive weapons", eager to use but difficult to use. Technically difficult as laws, conditions and procedures for conducting very demanding conditions. The difficulty of preparing resources like manpower, time and financial costs for preparing the dossier, the process to pursue the case ...

. Thus, it seems that unused tools PVTM big error from the DN, ma'am?

+ This is the story of "accountable first century, the post responsible person". Since no good preparation so that companies can not use Vietnamese Good stuff PVTM inherently important. Recently, a number of businesses and industries make written requests for the government to stand up event. The survey also showed that 28% of businesses want government financial aid to sue. But government can only investigate the phenomenon of unfair competition when businesses need. Government not to sue on behalf of businesses.

                                                                                                                                                                                     CHAN LUAN